<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Regulation on Greycloak</title><link>https://greycloak.com/tags/regulation/</link><description>Recent content in Regulation on Greycloak</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright © 2023, Vince Wadhwani; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://greycloak.com/tags/regulation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The AI Slowdown Debate Just Became a Procurement Problem</title><link>https://greycloak.com/post/2026-09-17-the-ai-slowdown-debate-goes-mainstream/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://greycloak.com/post/2026-09-17-the-ai-slowdown-debate-goes-mainstream/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;The practical thing that changed this week is that the frontier labs themselves started negotiating a slower, more governed release cadence, and governments have joined the conversation. For anyone building a roadmap around a specific model or vendor, that shifts two things at once: how fast the tooling underneath you will keep changing, and how much regulatory exposure sits between you and the models you depend on. The extinction headlines are the noise. The governance moves underneath them are the signal, and they are concrete enough to plan around.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>