<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Automation on Greycloak</title><link>https://greycloak.com/tags/automation/</link><description>Recent content in Automation on Greycloak</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright © 2023, Vince Wadhwani; all rights reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://greycloak.com/tags/automation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>When to Reach for a Judgment Model Instead of an LLM</title><link>https://greycloak.com/post/2026-09-17-a-new-class-of-ai-judgment-models-arrives/</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://greycloak.com/post/2026-09-17-a-new-class-of-ai-judgment-models-arrives/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;If you have been wiring an LLM into every classification and routing decision in your product, there is now a reason to reconsider the pattern. A new model called JEV, from a company named Typesafe, is built to answer narrow questions with probabilities rather than prose. The practical consequence is that a check you could previously afford to run only on selected cases, or at the end of a task, becomes cheap and fast enough to run on every incoming request, after every draft, across every candidate document. That changes the economics of self-checking, ticket routing, and agent orchestration, which is where a lot of real automation quietly succeeds or fails.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When AI Solves the Problem but Skips the Understanding</title><link>https://greycloak.com/post/2026-09-16-mathematicians-warn-ai-benchmarks-harm-their-field/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://greycloak.com/post/2026-09-16-mathematicians-warn-ai-benchmarks-harm-their-field/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;If your organization is deploying AI to produce the output of expert work, a letter published this week by some of the world's most accomplished mathematicians names a cost that won't show up on next quarter's productivity dashboard: the erosion of the judgment that made the work valuable in the first place. The argument is narrow on its surface and much broader underneath, and it's worth reading before you sign off on the next automation project aimed at your senior people.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Where AI creates new offerings, not just savings</title><link>https://greycloak.com/post/2026-09-13-opportunity-ai-using-models-to-do-new-things/</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://greycloak.com/post/2026-09-13-opportunity-ai-using-models-to-do-new-things/</guid><description>
&lt;p&gt;If your AI roadmap is a list of tasks to make cheaper, you're using half the tool. The more useful question for a leadership team right now is where AI lets you offer something you couldn't offer before, because that's where the durable advantage sits. Efficiency gains reset everyone's baseline and quickly become table stakes. The teams that also hunt for new capabilities are the ones likely to pull ahead.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>